Facebook Pixel
Post-Redundancy β€” Case Study

Made Redundant.
Approved for a Mortgage 4 Months Later.

An Auckland marketing manager made redundant re-entered the workforce quickly. Finch structured a strong case despite the recent income gap on his file.

4 mo
Since Redundancy
6 wks
Job Search Length
$95K
New Salary
$560K
Loan Approved
21 days
To Pre-Approval

The problem.

Ryan, a 36-year-old marketing manager in Auckland, was made redundant in a company-wide restructure. After a 6-week job search, he secured a new role at a similar level and salary ($95,000) with a different employer. Four months after the redundancy, with 10 weeks into his new job, he and his partner found a home they wanted to buy.

Their bank's automated system flagged the redundancy and recent employment gap immediately, treating it as a significant risk factor regardless of the fact Ryan was now settled in a new, equivalent role. The initial response suggested waiting a further 6 months of continuous new employment before reapplying.

Ryan and his partner were concerned that waiting meant losing the specific property they'd found, in a market where good family homes in their target area were moving quickly.

How we solved it.

1
Redundancy context documentationWe obtained Ryan's formal redundancy letter confirming it was a genuine company-wide restructure unrelated to his performance, plus his redundancy payment details β€” context that materially changes how lenders view an employment gap.
2
New role stability evidenceWe compiled his new employment agreement, an employer reference confirming strong early performance, and his first pay cycle's payslips to demonstrate the new role was genuine, ongoing, and at an equivalent salary to his prior position.
3
Lender selection around recent employment gapsWe identified a lender whose policy assesses redundancy-driven gaps on their specific circumstances β€” genuine restructure, quick re-employment, comparable new salary β€” rather than applying a blanket minimum-tenure rule regardless of context.
4
Redundancy payout as a serviceability bufferRather than treating Ryan's untouched redundancy payout as irrelevant, we presented it as an additional financial buffer strengthening the overall application, which several lenders view favourably as reduced risk.

The result.

Pre-approval was issued in 21 days β€” well within the timeframe needed to secure the property they wanted. Ryan and his partner purchased a 4-bedroom home in Papatoetoe for $555,000, settling 6 weeks later.

Their loan was fixed 2 years at 5.75%, and Ryan's redundancy payout was kept aside as a genuine emergency buffer rather than being used toward the deposit, exactly as structured in the application.

Ryan's feedback: "The word 'redundancy' seemed to shut every conversation down immediately. Finch looked at the full picture β€” a new job at the same level, a clean explanation, and money in the bank β€” and found a lender who agreed that mattered more than the gap itself."

Useful NZ sources: the Reserve Bank of New Zealand for current lending policy, and Kāinga Ora for first-home support schemes.

Could we help you
get the same result?

Book a free 15-minute consultation. We compare your scenario across 20+ NZ lenders and structure the loan for the best outcome.

Book a Free Call β†’ More NZ Case Studies