Facebook Pixel
Weathertightness β€” Case Study

A Home With Weathertightness Issues.
Financed With Remediation Costs Included.

An Auckland couple wanted a character 1990s home flagged for weathertightness risk. Finch structured finance covering both the purchase and the remediation.

1998
Build Year
$95K
Remediation Cost
$780K
Purchase Price
2
Lenders Assessed
26 days
To Approval

The problem.

Nathan and Grace fell in love with a 1998-built monolithic-clad home in Auckland's Mount Albert β€” exactly the era and construction style associated with New Zealand's well-known weathertightness ("leaky home") issues. A pre-purchase building report confirmed moisture ingress risk and recommended a full re-clad, estimated at $95,000.

Their first bank declined the application outright once the building report was disclosed β€” citing the property as an unacceptable security risk in its current condition, full stop, regardless of the couple's income or deposit strength.

Nathan and Grace still wanted the property (priced accordingly below comparable weathertight homes in the same street) but needed a lender willing to finance both the purchase and the remediation as a combined package.

How we solved it.

1
Remediation scope and quote formalisationWe had Nathan and Grace obtain a fixed-price quote from a qualified re-cladding specialist, converting the building report's estimate into a bankable, itemised scope of works β€” a requirement for any lender to consider remediation-inclusive lending.
2
Lender selection for as-if-complete valuationWe identified a lender that will value a weathertightness-affected property on an "as-if-remediated" basis when a fixed-price contract and qualified building consent are in place, rather than only lending against the property's current, discounted condition.
3
Staged drawdown structuringThe loan was structured with an initial drawdown to fund settlement at the discounted purchase price, and a second staged drawdown released against the remediation contract as work milestones were completed and signed off.
4
Council consent and LBP coordinationWe worked with Nathan and Grace's building consultant to ensure the remediation used a Licensed Building Practitioner and had council consent lodged before the lender would confirm the staged drawdown facility.

The result.

Approval was issued in 26 days once the fixed-price remediation contract was in place β€” a deal the first bank had refused outright. Nathan and Grace settled on the $780,000 purchase, with remediation funded as part of the same facility rather than requiring separate finance.

The re-clad was completed within 5 months, and the property was re-valued post-remediation at a level consistent with weathertight comparable sales in the same street, protecting their long-term equity position.

Grace's feedback: "We thought we'd lost the house the moment the first bank said no. Finch found a lender who understood exactly how to finance a property mid-remediation, not just a finished one."

Useful NZ sources: the Reserve Bank of New Zealand for current lending policy, and Kāinga Ora for first-home support schemes.

Could we help you
get the same result?

Book a free 15-minute consultation. We compare your scenario across 20+ NZ lenders and structure the loan for the best outcome.

Book a Free Call β†’ More NZ Case Studies